03/14/2022
- CASE WAS FILED WITH COURT
03/15/2022
- CASE SET FOR A F.E.D. HEARING ON 04/05/2022 AT 1:00 PM
- SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ISSUED TO BAILIFF FOR PERSONAL SERVICE
- F.E.D SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ISSUED TO DEFENDANT VIA ORDINARY
- MAIL W/CERTIFICATE OF MAILING.
- FILING FOR SECOND DEFENDANT$10.00
- PAYMENT - RECEIPT NO. 2200514 IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 140.00
03/17/2022
- RETURN OF SERVICE RECEIVED. PAPERS WERE TAPED TO THE DOOR
- 03-16-2022 BY BAILIFF BART DUNAVENT
04/05/2022
- HEARING BEFORE MAGISTRATE. ALL PARTIES APPEARED.
- EXHIBITS ENTERED. WITNESSES TESTIFIED. MAGISTRATE HAS TAKEN
- MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT. PARTIES TO SUBMIT WRITTEN ARGUMENT
- CASE SET FOR A STATUS CONFRNCE ON 04/19/2022 AT 1:30 PM
04/18/2022
- PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM RE: DRUG USE FILED
04/19/2022
- DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW FILED
04/21/2022
- MAGISTRATE'S DECISION FORWARDED TO JUDGE HUBBELL.
04/25/2022
- MAGISTRATE'S DECISION SIGNED BY JUDGE HUBBELL. THE
- MAGISTRATE GRANTS JUDGMENT TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE
- PLAINTIFF'S CASE IS DISMISSED. COSTS TO PLAINTIFF.
04/28/2022
- COPY FEES -128 PAGES $12.80
- PAYMENT - RECEIPT NO. 2200883 IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 12.80
05/06/2022
- REQUEST FOR TAPES OF HEARING TO PREPARE TRANSCRIPT FILED
- BY ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
- OBJECTIONS TO THE DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE AND REQUEST
- FOR ORAL ARGUMENT, FILED BY ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
05/18/2022
- DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE
- DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE FILED VIA FAX
- ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION VIA FAX FEE.2.00
- NUMBER OF PAGES RECEIVED VIA FAX TRANSMISSION.3.00
- AUDIO RECORDING OF COURT PROCEEDINGS$5.00
- PAYMENT - RECEIPT NO. 2201010 IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 5.00
05/25/2022
- CLERK CONTACTED DAVID DONNETT THAT THE AUDIO FOR THE
- HEARING ON THIS CASE IS READY. DUE TO THE HOLIDAY, MR.
- DONNETT WILL PICK UP THE DVR ON TUESDAY, INCASE THE MAIL IS
06/07/2022
- PAYMENT - RECEIPT NO. 2201145 IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 5.00
06/29/2022
- JUDGMENT ENTRY, FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE
- HUBBELL. THE MAGISTRATE'S DECISION IS ADOPTED IN FULL, AS
- IF FULLY REWRITTEN HEREIN. PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION IS
|