Lebanon Municipal Court

Docket entry on small claims case number CVI 0900089

Click for case information
Case Number: CVI 0900089
Defendant(s): Braddock, Peggy
Plaintiff(s): Weiler, Deborah
    04/22/2009
    • CASE WAS FILED WITH COURT
    • CASE SET FOR A INITIAL CALL ON 05/26/2009 AT 1:00 PM
    • SMALL CLAIMS FILING FEE FOR 1 DEFENDANT $45.00
    • PAYMENT - RECEIPT NO. 0901445 IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 45.00
    • SUM WAS ISSUED BY CERT MAIL
    • TO: BRADDOCK, PEGGY
    • CERT MAIL # 7109 7930 3410 0008 4127
    05/01/2009
    • CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT RETURNED SIGNED BY
    • MARGARET BRADDOCK
    • ON
    • #7109 7930 3410 0008 4127
    05/18/2009
    • MOTION TO CONTINUE FILED BY DEFENDANT VIA FAX. FORWARDED TO
    • JUDGE FOR REVIEW.
    05/21/2009
    • MOTION TO CONTINUE GRANTED BY JUDGE BOGEN. CASE TO BE
    • RESET TO 6/2/09
    • CASE SET FOR A INITIAL CALL ON 06/02/2009 AT 1:30 PM
    06/02/2009
    • BOTH PARTIES APPEARED. PLTF PROVED BY PREPONDERANCE OF EVI-
    • DENCE DEF FAILED TO PAY FOR LAUNDRY SERVICE ($65) AND DEF.
    • OWES BACK RENT OF $233.07 AS PER CONTRACT. PLTF FAILED TO
    • PROVE SHE SHOULD RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR STALL DAMAGE.
    • JUDGMENT TO PLAINTIFF IN AMOUNT OF $298.07 PLUS COSTS AND
    • INTEREST.
    • COPIES TO PARTIES BY ORDINARY MAIL.
    07/09/2009
    • LETTER FROM DEF W/COPY OF CHECK WRITTEN TO PLTF FILED. DEF
    • ONLY PAID JUDGMENT AMOUNT. COURT COSTS & INTEREST WERE NOT
    • INCLUDED. LETTER WAS WRITTEN TO DEFEDANT EXPLAINING THIS
    • SITUATION; ALSO ADV. SATISFACTION MUST COME FROM PLAINTIFF
    07/16/2009
    • PLTF CAME IN, HAD UNCASHED CHECK W/HER. STATED SHE DID NOT
    • WANT TO CASH CHECK AS IT WAS MARKED "PAYMENT IN FULL" BUT
    • DID NOT INCLUDE COSTS OR INTEREST. SHE WAS GIVEN COPY OF
    • LETTER SENT TO DEFEDANT AND WAS ADV. WE WOULD NOT CLOSE CASE
    07/17/2009
    • DEF CALLED, IRATE, STATING JDMT ENTRY DOES NOT STATE COSTS
    • & INTEREST ARE DUE. DECISION WAS READ TO HER. DEF IS HIGHLY
    • INDIGNANT AND FEELS HER RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED. SAYS THIS
    • COURT IS MESSED UP AND CLERK IS CRAZY. STATES SHE CONSULTED
    • LEGAL AID AND 3 OTHER PEOPLE WHO TOLD HER MAGISTRATE'S
    • DECISION IS WRONG. AFTER LENGTHY BUT FUTILE CONVERSATION,
    • SHE ADVISED SHE WOULD BE CONTACTING AN ATTORNEY.
    07/21/2009
    • CORRESPONDENCE RECV'D FROM DEF. COPY OF LETTER, JUDGMENT,
    • AND CHECK FOR C/C AND ACCRUED INTEREST INCLUDED. NOTE ON
    • COURT'S LETTER READS "DEBT PAID IN FULL CHECK 1121 7/17/09
    • RELEASE LIEN". CASE STAYS OPEN TILL PLTF FILES SATISFACTION
    07/21/2010
    • LETTER + COPIES OF CHECKS TO PLTF SUBMITTED BY DEFENDANT
    • WHO REQUESTS COURT NOTIFY CREDIT BUREAUS OF CLOSURE OF CASE.
    • PLTF HAS NOT FILED SATISFACTION/DISMISSAL W/COURT SO NO
    • ACTION CAN BE TAKEN BY COURT. DEF WILL BE ADVISED AGAIN.
    • LETTER TO PLTF ASKING HER TO CHECK HER RECORDS AND CONFIRM
    • THE JUDGMENT WAS PAID IN FULL. REQUEST SHE NOTIFY COURT IN
    • WRITING IF SATISFIED. COURT WILL SEND TIME-STAMPED COPY TO
    • DEF FOR SUBMISSION TO CREDIT AGENCIES.
    07/28/2010
    • ENTRY OF SATISFACTION FILED BY PLTF/ATTY. FORWARDED TO
    • JUDGE FOR SIGNATURE.
    07/30/2010
    • ENTRY OF SATISFACTION SIGNED BY JUDGE BOGEN.
    08/09/2010
    • DEF COPY OF SATISFACTION RETURNED UNSERVED BY USPS

Copyright © 2009 - 2026 Henschen & Associates, Inc. All rights reserved